|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
91
   |
Posted - 2014.04.08 12:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Never forget
Do you think CCP is on the right track? How long do you think it will take? |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 12:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would love to get a response from the devs. Is this still the roadmap for nullsec? |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 13:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:Spurty wrote:Logistics should be a weakness for larger organizations of players. It should avoid being tedious, but it should remain a major point of concern as size increases, and be one of the primary drawbacks of growing beyond a certain size.
- this idea was probably the first idea to fall off the table I guess.
Because it's completely impractical and logistics is, by its nature, efficiently scaleable. Even if you implemented some completely stupid arbitrary ingame rules to prevent that the end result would be creating hundreds of tiny little corps or organizations to accommodate logistics.
You could still make it more risky..... |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 14:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:
Looking at the chart makes me think its part of a CCP troll. See the list for mining. Lucrative is listed.
Yea, it brings a bittervet tear to my eye. Nullsec used to be full of miners even though the population in Eve was much lower. Today nullsec is just full of nullified T3's.
Ranger 1 wrote:
Yep, EVE was a much more interesting place when you had to defend your assets while moving them... or had the opportunity to interdict someone else's.
Indeed. |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
92
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 17:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:I think the coming changes to refining are a good first step in making 0.0 mining more of a thing than it is currently. So in that regard, yes they are on the right track. Though much more needs to happen to make null sec empires more reliant on their local resources instead of leeching someone else's empire (NPC empire space) to maintain their own. That's something I would eventually like to see happen.
I agree. It's a good step. I would just like to get a confirmation that this roadmap is still the one they are following.
DaReaper wrote:
The siphon and mobile hanger units helped null as well, games new ways to get money and be able to roam on yoru own.
Mobile cyno jammer should of helped as well. So slowly they are making changes. I think by the time the new space open up, we will have a complete null sec revamp, over a long period of time. Probably by that time, we will have new sov mechanics too, but implemented over a few expansions and not just one big lump.
Adding some mobile units is in my opinion some very small steps. But i agree, it's a good change. But much more is needed and keep in mind that the dev blog is from 2011. If they are keeping that speed we might have new sov mechanics by 2020. |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
92
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 00:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
Gogela wrote:I'm going to dovetail the OP with this link to the old F&I forums, which have each topic of discussion with regards to nullsec goals (early 2011). It's worth reading if you are interested...I was most interested in the concept of "smallholding", but I think we are actually getting there w/ mobile depots and the like.
Woha... To bad those got lost when they changed forum. Many good ideas.
CCP should really repost them. |
Xoria Krint
DOT Inc
94
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 22:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:Also an updated white board with would be nice also
Indeed. I hope they will release more information at the Fanfest... Not only DUST and ship skins. |
|
|
| |
|